The amount of carbon locked away in frozen soils in the far Northern Hemisphere is double previous estimates and rapid melting could accelerate global warming, a study released on Wednesday says.
Large areas of northern Russia, Canada, Nordic countries and the U.S. state of Alaska have deep layers of frozen soil near the surface called permafrost. Global warming has already triggered rapid melting of the permafrost in some areas, releasing powerful greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane.
"Massive amounts of carbon stored in frozen soils at high latitudes are increasingly vulnerable to exposure to the atmosphere," said Pep Canadell, executive director of the Global Carbon Project at Australia's state-funded Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
Read more
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Erosion Control News
Libby Montana: EPA Ordered Cleanup and Intervention is Dramatic 180 Degree Turn in Policy | The Moderate Voice
The Obama administration has a new take on the duties and budgets of the EPA, not only different, but startlingly so, from previous admins who used the stalling technique for decades to deal with citizens very real chargers re
* Agent Orange exposure during Nam
Black Lung out of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and more
* >Radiation exposure deaths in Utah, New Mexico, Arizona
* Water contamination of cadmium and other heavy minerals, Brownsville
* Land contamination by uranium heaps, Rocky Flats, Colorado
* Johns Manville, asbestos contamination
* Trailer industry, formaldehyde contamination
* Libby Montana, asbestos contamination.
Read this and many more erosion control news
The Obama administration has a new take on the duties and budgets of the EPA, not only different, but startlingly so, from previous admins who used the stalling technique for decades to deal with citizens very real chargers re
* Agent Orange exposure during Nam
Black Lung out of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and more
* >Radiation exposure deaths in Utah, New Mexico, Arizona
* Water contamination of cadmium and other heavy minerals, Brownsville
* Land contamination by uranium heaps, Rocky Flats, Colorado
* Johns Manville, asbestos contamination
* Trailer industry, formaldehyde contamination
* Libby Montana, asbestos contamination.
Read this and many more erosion control news
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Soil Erosion Control – Human Health Hazard – Asbestos Contaminated Soils Up-date
When we hear the word "asbestos" we often think back on the controversy of the late 1970’s when it became common knowledge that asbestos was indeed a human health hazard. Asbestos however, is still a relevant hazard today in a number of different capacities. While most asbestos containing products were banned by the Consumer Product Safety Commission and regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency, unfortunately it still exists in hundreds of older products as well as in trace amounts in newly manufactured products. Among new products that may still contain asbestos are soil retention enhancers, particularly vermiculite.1
Asbestos is a routine analyte in contaminated land investigations and is a potential contaminant for a range of historic land uses due to its widespread use as described in CLR 8: Potential Contaminants for the Assessment of Land and historic Department of Environment Industry Profiles.
For all contaminated land investigations it is important to express the amount of a contaminant in a quantity of soil and to calculate associated uncertainties within the investigation itself2.
Over the last five to ten years, the remediation and redevelopment of contaminated property, commonly called "brownfields," has become more prevalent, in part due to both federal and state legislation which makes remediation of contaminated property easier, and provides additional liability protections for those undertaking cleanups. A "brownfield" is generally defined as "real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant."3
Naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) includes fibrous minerals found in certain types of rock formations. NOA can take the form of long, thin, separable fibers. Natural weathering or human disturbance can break NOA down to microscopic fibers, easily suspended in air.
Often soil and vermiculite material will contain asbestos fibers either as naturally occurring asbestos in rock, such as serpentine, or as contamination from asbestos removal activities. The need to identify the presence of asbestos fibers in of these materials may often be necessary prior to alteration, remediation, or removal of such material. Serpentine rock is often a component of road material, parking lots, playground surfaces, waste piles, and general excavation and construction sites.
There is no health threat if NOA remains undisturbed and does not become airborne. When airborne NOA is inhaled, these thin fibers irritate tissues and resist the body's natural defenses. Asbestos, a known carcinogen, causes cancers of the lung and the lining of internal organs, as well as asbestosis and other diseases that inhibit lung function. Covering NOA with clean soil or planting grass reduces exposure.
Workplace exposure to asbestos is heavily legislated and a clear regime of guidance exists for contamination on land via the EA's CLR/CLEA publications.4 But there is no standard remedial level for asbestos in soils or for airborne monitoring for asbestos in the environment.
This health consultation has been prepared in response to the request made by the City of Nashau to the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services(DHHS) for assistance in evaluating the health hazard associated with potential exposure to asbestos contaminated soils excavated during a public works project in the City of Nashua. Specifically, this document evaluates the soil and air sampling data that was collected to evaluate the potential release of asbestos fibers to the community during removal activities at the Sargeant Avenue and Broad Street sites. This health consultation has been prepared by the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Community and Public Health, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health (DHHS) through a cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).5
WHAT TO LOOK FOR ...
Asbestos is a term used for several naturally-occurring fibrous minerals.
Asbestos most commonly occurs in ultramafic rock that has undergone partial
or complete alteration to serpentine rock, and often contains chrysotile asbestos.
Another form of asbestos, tremolite, can be found associated with ultramafic rock,particularly near faults.
Asbestos fibers are released from rock when it is crushed or broken and through natural weathering processes. The fibers are tiny and may be invisible to the naked eye. Since this rock may be present in the soils around your home, or may have been used in the past on your driveway or walkway, there is a potential for asbestos exposures where you live. This could happen through routine activities that crush asbestos-containing rock or create dust in soils that contain asbestos fibers.
Some examples of these activities are:
- Driving over areas surfaced with
ultramafic or serpentine rock - Rototilling, plowing the ground, or using a shovel
- Riding horses or moving livestock
- Construction activities, such as pool installation
- Using a leaf blower to clean sidewalks
For the identification of asbestos in either soil or vermiculite, EMSL Analytical, Inc. follows the California Air Resources Board Method 435 (CARB 435)7
"For construction, paving, school, development, excavation, mining, and other related companies, the CARB 435 method allows clients to check for asbestos with accuracy before they excavate", states Daniel B. Kocher, Western Sales Manager for EMSL8. "The method provides our clients with an accurate determination of asbestos content prior to commencement. In addition, the use of in-house milling allows EMSL to provide maximum options for turn-around."
Soil Washing Technology Background9
The concept of reducing soil contamination through the use of soil washing and particle size separation is based on the finding that most organic and inorganic contaminants tend to bind preferentially to clay, silt, and organic soil particles. In the washing process, the fine clay and silt particles are separated from the coarser sand and gravel soil particles. The separated fines and contaminants are dewatered into a dry filter cake suitable for off-site disposal. Additional treatment of the sand and gravel fractions maybe incorporated into the process as needed. The cleaned sand and gravel fraction can be returned to the site.
“Soil washing can be used for a wide range of contaminants including metals, organics and asbestos." Erik Groenendijk of www.art-engineering.com explains.
Mr. Groenendijk continues "The effectiveness of soil washing is based on separation of contaminants in a water based process. In principle asbestos can be separated from the soil in the washing process depending on the physical form of the asbestos and soil type. The optimal remediation and soil treatment approach for each site depends on project specific conditions and is determined in a technical feasibility study."
These technical and regulatory guidelines were developed to provide all stakeholders(technology users, technology developers, the regulated community, and the public) with some degree of predictability and consistency in technology deployment from state to state.
States reserve the right to go beyond these guidelines, but should have a rationale for doing so.
Because of the wide variability among states, these guidelines do not include any emission criteria for air, or cleanup criteria for soil or water.
Soil washing is routinely employed in the Netherlands by Hiejmans for contaminants including asbestos.
To date, over two million tonnes of soil have been treated in HBR10 or Heijmans installations.
The process is a physical treatment involving the mechanical and chemical separation of contaminated soil particles from uncontaminated soil.
From a feed stream of basically granular soils, the product streams would include contaminated coarse organics, clean coarse and sand products, contaminated fine organics and contaminated silts and clays. Water used within the system is continuously recycled as part of the process.
Contaminants treatable by soils washing include
- Petroleum Hydrocarbons
- Cyanides
- PAH
- Organotins
- Heavy Metals
- Pesticices
- PCB
- Fibrous Asbestos
Asbestos Testing and Treatments in Soils. A Work in Progress
11Work is ongoing at the former Vospers shipyard (Woolston Riverside, Southampton) to develop a solution for contamination issues that include asbestos in soils. CampbellReith12, on behalf of the South East England Development Agency (SEEDA), has implemented a series of trials and research experiments to help clarify the level of risk presented by varying levels and types of asbestos in soils.
Asbestos-contaminated soil cleanup guidance13
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (the Division) has established specific management requirements for asbestos-contaminated soil under Section 5.5 of the Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities (6 CCR 1007-2), effective April 30, 2006.
Fungi iron-out asbestos pollution
Bioremediation might make fibre-contaminated soil safer.
"Fungi may help decontaminate asbestos-polluted soils," say Silvia Perotto and co-workers at the University of Torino. They have found a fungus that takes the toxic bite out of asbestos fibres.14
References
- Asbestos hazard
- Ramsey et al 2007
- Brownfields
- Asbestos Testing and Treatments in Soils
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
- ASBESTOS-CONTAINING ROCK AND SOIL
- Carb435
- EMSL Analytical, Inc.
- Soil Washing Technology Background
- HBR is a 50/50 joint venture company established between a UK Contractor, C A Blackwell (Contracts) Ltd and a Dutch remediation specialist Heijmans Infra Techniek B.V
- A Work In Progress
- Campbell Reith - Consulting Engineers for Building, Intrastructure, Traffic and Transportation and Environmental
- Soil cleanup guidance
- Fungi iron-out asbestos pollution
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Clean up Great Lakes
Barack Obama pledges $475 million for next year
Cleaning up toxic substances and "areas of concern": $146.9 million, or 31 percent. The EPA will control most of the spending ($113.9 million), reducing toxins, including PCBs, mercury, dioxin and pesticides. The Army Corps of Engineers will get another $10 million for this task, and with other agencies will help remove contaminated sediment and other industrial pollution that hampers places like the Cuyahoga and Ashtabula rivers and Lake Erie harbors.
Read this and more erosion news
Cleaning up toxic substances and "areas of concern": $146.9 million, or 31 percent. The EPA will control most of the spending ($113.9 million), reducing toxins, including PCBs, mercury, dioxin and pesticides. The Army Corps of Engineers will get another $10 million for this task, and with other agencies will help remove contaminated sediment and other industrial pollution that hampers places like the Cuyahoga and Ashtabula rivers and Lake Erie harbors.
Read this and more erosion news
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Coastal Erosion
This site was just added to our expanding library of coastal erosion control websites
Save Our Sand: The Inlet Solution > About Terminal Groins
A terminal groin is a sediment management structure that reduces beach erosion by retaining a predetermined amount of sand before it reaches the inlet. ...Save Our Sand: The Inlet Solution > About Terminal Groins
A terminal groin is a sediment management structure that reduces beach erosion by retaining a predetermined amount of sand before it reaches the inlet. ...
Enjoy!
Save Our Sand: The Inlet Solution > About Terminal Groins
A terminal groin is a sediment management structure that reduces beach erosion by retaining a predetermined amount of sand before it reaches the inlet. ...Save Our Sand: The Inlet Solution > About Terminal Groins
A terminal groin is a sediment management structure that reduces beach erosion by retaining a predetermined amount of sand before it reaches the inlet. ...
Enjoy!
Monday, May 4, 2009
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Regarding
PART 91, SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (SESC),
of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA),
1994 PA 451, as Amended
Why is erosion and sediment control important?
Sediment is the greatest pollutant by volume impacting our lakes, streams, and wetlands. Sediment is the product of uncontrolled erosion. Everyone in Michigan is affected by erosion and off-site sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation result in: loss of fertile topsoil, filling of lakes and streams, increased flooding, damage to plant and animal life, and structural damage to buildings and roads.
Read these frequently asked questions and many more from across the globe
PART 91, SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (SESC),
of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (NREPA),
1994 PA 451, as Amended
Why is erosion and sediment control important?
Sediment is the greatest pollutant by volume impacting our lakes, streams, and wetlands. Sediment is the product of uncontrolled erosion. Everyone in Michigan is affected by erosion and off-site sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation result in: loss of fertile topsoil, filling of lakes and streams, increased flooding, damage to plant and animal life, and structural damage to buildings and roads.
Read these frequently asked questions and many more from across the globe
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Project will help property owners make erosion prevention decisions
While the latter has been the traditional method of stabilizing shorelines, more natural "green" approaches such as natural buffers and wetland restoration have been touted as more environmentally-friendly, longer-term options.
A project getting under way in North Carolina will help coastal property owners along its sounds and mainland shorelines make more informed decisions about the methods they choose to use.
The Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology has awarded a $717,000 grant to the N.C. National Estuarine Research Reserve and the NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research to examine different methods of erosion prevention.
Read full story and many more erosion articles
A project getting under way in North Carolina will help coastal property owners along its sounds and mainland shorelines make more informed decisions about the methods they choose to use.
The Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology has awarded a $717,000 grant to the N.C. National Estuarine Research Reserve and the NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research to examine different methods of erosion prevention.
Read full story and many more erosion articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)